Much of what is presented here is a matter of public record. Some I strongly believe to be factual. Other materials are theories, whether they be mine or others’. With regard to these, I would admonish the reader that there were very disturbing concepts which were presumed to be theoretical mere months ago. When some of us articulated these, we were ridiculed – but they have since been proven to be factual.
One of the more troublesome aspects of the 2008 election cycle for the Obama campaign was the revelation of the candidate’s association with Weather Underground founder and domestic terrorist Bill Ayers. With his co-conspirators (and Bernardine Dohrn, who would later become his wife), Ayers engaged in numerous bombings in the U.S. during the early 1970s, but ultimately escaped prison on technical grounds. He remains utterly unrepentant with regard to his actions.
Recently, Ayers appeared on Fox News’ The Kelly File. Prior to its airing, an excerpt of the Ayers interview was discussed with the regular panelists on another Fox show, The Five. Tempers flared, and it was apparent that some of the panelists were taking the Ayers-Obama relationship much more seriously now than in 2008, given the performance and policies of the current President.
Barack Obama’s political career was launched at a fundraiser held at Bill Ayers home; he and Ayers served on several boards together, yet Obama claimed to barely know him. These are not allegations; they are matters of public record. In 2012, investigative reporter Jerome Corsi interviewed Allen Hulton, who had been the Ayers’ family mailman. He spoke of the Ayers’ family having supported “a young foreign student” – Barack Obama, who told Hulton that he was being groomed to be president.
These days, the trouble for President Obama has been primarily with what he refers to as “phony scandals” contrived by Republicans, the most prominent being that which had its genesis in the Sept. 11 2012 attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya.
It has been revealed that the diplomatic mission, which included a CIA annex, was the hub for a clandestine gun running operation to benefit rebels in Syria who were engaged in a struggle with dictator Bashar al-Assad. Since the 2012 attack, Obama unilaterally amended laws prohibiting this, and has been supplying the rebels with congressional approval.
Unfortunately, this ostensible support for whom the administration called “moderate” Muslims only served to destabilize the entire region, when the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) invaded Iraq. Further, it has been confirmed that the Obama administration secretly trained and funded ISIS.
Sunni Muslims are the majority sect in Islam, and ISIS is comprised of Sunni Muslims. If one keeps to the origins narrative of President Obama, his father was a Sunni Muslim, although many believe that he was actually an atheist. Obama’s contention that he is a Christian is dismissed by many given his Islamist and Marxist sympathies and policies respectively, and that his immersion in Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s Black Liberation Theology in Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago disqualifies him as a mainstream Christian in any case.
The longer investigators and the press have had to research Obama’s background and origins narrative, the more incredulous it appears. While some have contended that Barack Hussein Obama senior may not have been the President’s father (suggesting such individuals as Frank Marshall Davis and Malcolm X, both of whom traveled in the circles of the reputed family of origin), the identity of Obama’s mother has now come into question. Some investigators have come to believe that the “Stanley Ann Dunham” identity was in fact wholly synthetic, citing such things as the lack of hard evidence for her existence, and the fact that no living person save Obama claims to have interacted with her.
These investigators theorize that Obama’s real mother was Elizabeth Ann Duke, a.k.a. JoAnn Newman, a Weather Underground terrorist who jumped bail in 1985, and who had charges against her mysteriously dropped by the Obama administration in 2009. She has not been seen nor heard from since 1985 – except, say the investigators, in the personage of an unidentified woman occasionally in Obama’s retinue. Newman is reputed to be a relative of the late Fred Newman, the iconic New York City-based communist activist who was instrumental in the political ascendancy of Michael Bloomberg and Rev. Al Sharpton.
All of the above have done nothing to dispel long-standing suspicions of identity fraud on the part of this president based on a forged birth certificate and Selective Service registration, as well as his purloined Social Security number and other irregularities.
Coming full circle to the Weather Underground with Duke (the name under which the aforementioned charges were filed against her) is indeed curious, but if we examine tangential aspects of this origins narrative, it is even more disturbing with regard to recent developments in the Middle East.
As indicated, the Arab Spring (which Obama was instrumental in catalyzing) and the recent surge in terrorist activity has chiefly involved Sunni Muslims. The late civil rights leader Malcolm X became a Sunni Muslim after visiting Mecca in April 1964. One narrative involving Malcolm contends that Obama is the offspring of he and Duke (JoAnn Newman), she having being a radical activist under the tutelage of Fred Newman and his cohorts. If Obama is indeed a closeted Muslim as some contend, he would undoubtedly be a Sunni.
As an aside: With regard to the administration being taken by surprise at the actions of jihadists, whether in Benghazi, Syria, or Iraq, I would remind the reader that few people in government are more knowledgeable regarding Muslims, their methods, and their motives than Obama.
Even more recently, and even more shocking, investigative researcher Martha Trowbridge uncovered evidence of Obama’s involvement with the Weather Underground dating back to his early teens. Trowbridge, who contends that the lion’s share of Obama’s origins narrative is false, has worked with (or contributed to the work of) most of the prominent researchers on Obama’s identity.
The evidence to which Trowbridge refers is in the form of a photograph appearing on the cover of the Weather Underground publication Osawatomie, Spring 1975 edition. The photo was taken at “The Battle of Boston” Weather Underground rally, and features a black teen who, if not the same individual represented in photos of Barack Obama prior to adulthood, missed out on a damn good chance to be the same person.
He is holding a hand-painted sign emblazoned with the words No! to Racism.
If the young man on the Weather Underground magazine cover is the same individual as those in the “Barack Obama” photos released by the Obama campaign (which he certainly appears to be), this throws even more doubt upon the origins and background of our current President.
Many have puzzled over the collusion between leftists and Islamists in America (one may recall that Obama sent Bill Ayers and a contingent of radicals to Egypt in 2009 to show the Muslim students how to do revolution right). There are obvious inconsistencies between what radical leftists espouse and the vision that Islamists have for this nation.
Allow me to elucidate: One, leftist radicals and Islamists have a common goal, which is the neutralization of America as a capitalist, republican (small “r”), and a Christian nation. The enemy of my enemy is my friend. Two, both factions are sufficiently deluded, narcissistic, and/or enflamed with zeal that they each believe they will be able to control the other once America has ceased to be a capitalist, republican, Christian nation.
Either way, America burns…
In the final analysis, it doesn’t really seem so far-fetched that “Barack Obama” (whether a communist, Islamist, or a Luddite) was actually brought up in the Weather Underground, so to speak, by a Weather Underground teen mom and other notorious ‘Sixties radicals, given the close relationship he wound up having with Ayers, his parents, and Ayers’ colleagues during his post-secondary education. Isn’t Obama’s ascendancy just the sort of plot such radicals might have contrived, given their known intent (as expressed during the 1960s and 1970s) to infiltrate “the system” and bring about a “quiet” revolution?
It doesn’t seem so quiet right now, does it?